Jap, kein Embargo mehr, jetzt kriegen wir Scores quer über die Skala verteilt... freu mich schon
Btw, dieses Fazit von Digitalchumps ist hervorragend:
Es ist ein ANDERES Metroid, wer damit nicht klar kommt sollte also die Finger von lassen !the real question is just this: if the changes to the classic formula are mostly detrimental, how much of a negative effect do they actually have?
And the answer, as is often the case, is contingent upon your personal opinion of what matters most. If you’re a die-hard Metroid fan looking for some action in Samus’ universe, you might resent the homogenized reinvention (FMV emphasis and hand-holding) that underlies Other M’s infrastructure, but you’ll still have a good time. If you’re purely an action/adventure fan looking for a solid game to enjoy, this will likely satiate. But if you hated Fusion’s modifications to the classic design, you’ll dislike Other M’s revisions even more. There’s no question about it: when the averages are calculated, in spite of its competence, Other M is farther from the comfortable franchise mean than any other Metroid title to date—so whether or not you can appreciate that sort of departure is entirely for you to determine.
/Edit: Jep, kreuz und quer über die Skala ^^
IGN: 8.5
DigitalChumps: 8.4
Gameinformer: 6.25
Destructoid 6.5
gamesradar: 7.0
Gamespot: 8.5
Wired: 9.0
Joystic: 4.5/5
GiantBomb: 4/5